December 13, 2019

Unrepresented Claimant with Rotator Cuff Injury Denied Necessary Rehab

post surgery rehabI want to talk with you today about rotator cuff injuries and the importance of both proper medical care and appropriate rehabilitation and followup.

In many respects the right kind of rehabilitation and follow-up medical care can make the difference between a return to full function and long term (and sometimes permanent) restriction of movement, stiffness and pain.

Recently I received a call from a prospective client who tore her right rotator cuff and underwent surgery, but was seeking legal advice because she sensed, correctly, that her workers’ comp doctor was not providing appropriate follow-up 1.

The prospective client told me that she hurt herself attempting to move a heavy box over her head and that shortly thereafter her right shoulder became painful, swollen and weak.  The industrial clinic doctor was unable to do much (other than waste a couple of weeks) and she was referred to a local orthopedist for consultation. [Read more…]

  1. I have changed the details of this case to preserve confidentiality, but the underlying principles are real.

Case Study: Workers Compensation Case Involving a Long Term Employee with Multiple Job Injuries

Welcome to the 4rd installment of my summer long series on Georgia Workers’ comp case studies. In the following case study, I discuss a case involving a long-term employee who sustained multiple job injuries.

The case of “Mr. F,” a long-term employee with multiple injuries

“Mr. F” has been employed by his company for 26 years as a machine operator and is required to maintain, repair, and run the machinery he is responsible for. He also operates a forklift in order to stock supplies. As a result of his job responsibilities, Mr. F sustained significant cervical and lumbar spine injuries as well as significant knee damage. His medical records indicate that he has continued to encounter pain and problems in these physical areas.

Mr. F’s treating physician (Dr. V) firmly believes that knee surgery is inevitable and that cervical and lumbar spine pain will be ongoing. To date, Dr. V continues to provide Mr. F with treatment in the hopes of relieving his pain. Due to the fact that the TTD has been reduced, Dr. V placed the man on “no-work” status so he did not lose the original amount of compensation for being unable to work due to his injuries. PPD ratings were also assessed which will be due and payable in the future.

Given the nature of Mr. F’s injuries and the residual problems which resulted from performing his job and will continue for years into the future, it is evident that his employer and insurer are responsible for compensating the man. As a result from the aforementioned circumstances, we have demanded a settlement in the amount of “X” and are awaiting a favorable settlement of our client’s case.