<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Georgia Workers Compensation blog &#187; Permanent impairment benefits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com/category/understanding-the-law/permanent-impairment-benefits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com</link>
	<description>Moderated by Attorney Jodi Ginsberg</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 17:00:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>

		<copyright>Ginsberg Law Offices, P.C.</copyright>
		<itunes:author>Jodi Brenner Ginsberg</itunes:author>
		<itunes:summary>Georgia workers' compensation law blog</itunes:summary>
		<itunes:explicit>No</itunes:explicit>
		<itunes:block>No</itunes:block>
		<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture" />
		<itunes:category text="Government &amp; Organizations">
			<itunes:category text="Local" />
		</itunes:category>
		
		<item>
		<title>What are the AMA Guidelines and Why Are They Important to My Case?</title>
		<link>http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com/2007/12/11/what-are-the-ama-guidelines-and-why-are-they-important-to-my-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com/2007/12/11/what-are-the-ama-guidelines-and-why-are-they-important-to-my-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jodi Ginsberg</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Permanent impairment benefits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Understanding the Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Winning Strategies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AMA Guidelines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability rating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[georgia workers compensation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permanent partial disability]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com/2007/12/11/what-are-the-ama-guidelines-and-why-are-they-important-to-my-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am often asked how I know when a case is ready to settle.&#160; There are many factors that go into this judgment call, one of the most important being the disability rating assigned to my client. What is a &#34;disability rating&#34; and how does it impact the settlement value of a Georgia workers compensation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am often asked how I know when a case is ready to settle.&nbsp; There are many factors that go into this judgment call, one of the most important being the disability rating assigned to my client.</p>
<h3>What is a &quot;disability rating&quot; and how does it impact the settlement value of a Georgia workers compensation case?</h3>
<p>The Georgia workers&#8217; compensation statute looks to the American Medical Association (AMA) Guidelines as the required framework for a physician to assign a disability rating to a claimant.&nbsp;&nbsp; The AMA Guidelines are designed to assist physicians in objectively evaluating a claimant&#8217;s injuries and limitations.&nbsp; AMA Guidelines currently exist for a wide variety of body systems &#8211; including, for example, the muskuloskeletal system, the cardiovascular system, the immune system, etc.&nbsp; The AMA Guidelines are used in Georgia workers&#8217; compensation cases, but they can also be used in personal injury matters.&nbsp; Click on the link to read how a <a rel="external" href="http://norfolk.injuryboard.com/motor-vehicle-accidents/ama-guidelines-for-permanent-partial-impairment-ratings-are-an-important-piece-of-the-personal-injury-puzzle.php" target="_blank">Virginia accident lawyer </a>discusses how he uses the Guidelines when evaluating a vehicle accident caes.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of the current AMA Guideline for the cervical spine (thanks to <a rel="external" href="http://www.spinallogic.com/ama_guides.html">Spinal-Logic.com</a>):</p>
<p><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">                    </font><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Category                    I (0%)</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        significant clinical findings</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        muscle spasm or guarding</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        documentable neurological impairment</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        alteration in structural integrity</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        fractures</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Category                    II (5-8%)</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> History                        and exam relevant to a specific injury</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">May                    include:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Muscle                        spasm</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Asymmetrical                        loss of range of motion</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Complaints                        of radiculopathy without objective findings</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> No                        alteration of structural integrity</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Or:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Significant                        radiculopathy</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Disc                        herniation at expected site verified by imaging study</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Patient                        improved after nonoperative treatment</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Or                    one of the following Fractures:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Less                        than 25% compression of one vertebral body</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Healed                        posterior element fracture without loss of structural integrity                        or radiculopathy</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Spinous                        or transverse process fracture with displacement</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Category                    III (15-18%)</font></p>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Significant                    signs of radiculopathy:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Dermatomal                        pain and/or sensory loss</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Loss                        of reflexes</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Loss                        of strength</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Muscular                        atrophy</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Neurologic                        impairment verified by electrodiagnosis</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Or:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Significant                        radiculopathy with disc herniation verified by imaging study</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Improvement                        of radiculopathy following surgery</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Or                    one of the following Fractures:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> 25-50%                        compression of one vertebral body (healed without loss of                        structural integrity)</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Posterior                        element fracture with displacement into the spinal canal                        (healed without loss of structural integrity)</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Category                    IV (25-28%)</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Bilateral                        or multilevel radiculopathy.</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Alteration                        in motion segment integrity determined from flexion extension                        radiographs as 3.5mm or greater of translation or angular                        motion 11 degrees greater than each adjacent level (radiculopathy                        need not be present).</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Or:</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> More                        than 50% compression of one vertebral body without residual                        neurological compromise.</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p align="left"><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif">Category                    V (35-38%)</font></p>
<div align="left">
<ul>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Significant                        impairment of the upper extremity requiring adaptive functional                        devices.</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Single                        level total neurologic loss.</font></li>
<li><font size="2" face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"> Multilevel                        neurological dysfunction.</font></li>
</ul>
</div>
<p>As you can see, this particular Guideline requires the examining physician to look at numerous factors and requires conclusions that fall within a proscribed range.&nbsp; In other words, a claimant with a Category IV cervical spine injury can qualify a disability rating of between 25 and 28%.&nbsp; The doctor has some leeway but the goal would be for similarly limited claimants to receive similar disability ratings regardless of who conducts the exam.</p>
<p>Not all physicians will issue an AMA Guideline rating and I have found that sometimes, treating doctors will refer a claimant out for a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) to determine the patient&#8217;s specific capacity for various physical activities like lifting, pushing, pulling, etc.&nbsp; In my experience, FCE evaluations often introduce a level of subjectivity into the disability rating process as clinicians performing the FCE tests are called upon to evaluate effort and motivation.&nbsp; This is especially true when the facility conducting the FCE receives most or all of its business from insurance companies.</p>
<p>In some instances, I will challenge the validity of a disability rating if I feel that the evaluating physician introduced too much subjectivity into the process.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Once a disability rating has been assigned, the Code provides for a calculation whereby the rating percentage is multipled by the claimant&#8217;s average weekly wage number and by a multiplier.&nbsp; The resulting product is called the Permanent Partial Disability amount and that figure becomes part of my settlement negotiation.</p>
<p>Obviously the higher the disability rating, the more serious the injury and the more uncertainty there will be for the claimant&#8217;s future.</p>
<p>Disability ratings are almost always issued when the claimant is approaching &quot;maximum medical improvement&quot; or that point where the claimant&#8217;s condition is beginning to stabalize.&nbsp; If you have been receiving weekly wage benefits and your doctor is beginning to talk about issuing a disaiblity rating, you need legal representation to help you understand what is happening and to mazimize your recovery.</p>


]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.georgiaworkerscompblog.com/2007/12/11/what-are-the-ama-guidelines-and-why-are-they-important-to-my-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

