Have you ever wondered how an insurance adjuster can influence your authorized workers’ compensation doctor? If you work in an industry where employees often get hurt, or where work injuries are likely to be serious, you can be certain that your employer’s insurance company has directed the human resource director at your company to include specific doctors on your company’s posted panel. Insurance adjusters know that physicians who derive most or all of their income from workers’ compensation referrals will be much less likely to keep you off work or order expensive tests.
The problem, of course, is that delays in needed tests, or delays in needed treatment can result in permanent injury to you. Further, if a panel doctor returns you to work and you are unable to perform your duties, you are likely to be fired putting you in a difficult financial situation and psychologically deterring you from pursuing your rightful benefits.
In this video I discuss a case where the authorized doctor flat out ignored his own physical therapist’s conclusions about my client’s very limited use of her arms, and issued a full duty return to work. I won’t let the insurer get away with this, of course, but I wanted you to see how broken the workers’ compensation medical system has become. I’d be willing to bet that this doctor knows that he was not living up to his oath to offer full and complete treatment to his patients, but his interest in making money and seeing those referrals seems to override his conscience.
Filed under Arms & Hands, Case studies, Medical Care, Understanding the Law by
A significant number of work injuries in Georgia involve back injuries. Unfortunately if you are being treated by a “posted panel” doctor, your treatment may be delayed or not taken seriously. In this video, I discuss certain “red flag” issues that demand immediate treatment with a spine specialist whose focus is your well being.
Filed under Back & neck injuries, Case studies, Medical benefits, Medical Care, Understanding the Law by
Under Georgia’s workers’ compensation law, your employer gets to direct where you get medical care if your employer provides you with a valid “posted panel of physicians.” Not surprisingly, posted panel doctors sometimes bring a pro-employer bias to their treatment of you. I regularly see – and you have no doubt heard stories about – cases in which a seriously injured man or woman is given a regular duty return to work, only to end up in surgery a few weeks later.
In 1990, the Georgia legislature gave injured workers an important new right, the “claimant’s IME (independent medical exam). Under this law, an injured worker can request an independent medical examination with a doctor of his choosing, paid for by the employer’s insurance company.
When properly used as part of a effective claim strategy, your claimant’s IME can be used to:
- refute the unfair and biased claim of industrial clinic doctors
- contest a premature return to work demand by the insurance adjuster
- support a request for a change in authorized treating physician
- support a reasonable settlement demand
However, as important and valuable as your claimant’s IME rights may be, this right is not open ended and it can be wasted if not used properly. More on Am I Entitled to More than One Independent Medical Exam if I have Multiple Work Injuries?
Filed under Medical benefits, Medical Care by
Many of my clients are surprised to learn that their husband, wife or significant other can ask for payment for “attendant care” of an injured worker at home. Why? Often my seriously injured clients cannot take care of basic necessities such as:
- bathing
- dressing
- meal preparation
- driving
- cleaning
Given that hospitals often release patients home as soon as possible, I see more and more instances where my clients recover mostly at home, with outpatient visits to rehab.
Under Georgia law (Georgia Code Section 34-9-200(a)), the employer/insurer must provide care that “shall be reasonably required and appear likely to effect a cure, give relief, or restore the employee to suitable employment.” In the case of Medical Office Management v. Hardee, the Georgia Court of Appeals held that:
There is no express prohibition in the Workers’ Compensation Act against the recovery by an employee of attendant care services provided by a family member, including a spouse. Nor does the employer show that a family member cannot provide attendant home care under the Board’s rules and regulations…
The employer had argued against this “spousal reimbursement” on the grounds that the spouse was performing tasks he/she would do otherwise. The Georgia Court of Appeals, as you can see, ruled otherwise, and permitted Ms. Hardee’s husband to collect a fee under the State Board fee schedule for attendant services.
What does this mean to you? More on Can my Spouse Get Paid by the Insurance Company for Helping Me Recover at Home from my Injury?
Filed under Medical benefits, Medical Care, Recent developments by
Often, when a worker injures his back on the job, the human resources manager will take down a claim and refer the worker to an industrial clinic for evaluation and treatment. All too often, the industrial clinic or other posted panel doctor will take X-rays, perform some basic neurological tests, then release the worker back to full duty work after a day or two of rest.
I often get these cases four to six weeks later when the injured worker finds himself unable to work because of severe back pain and limited mobility. In some instances the injured worker faces pressure and even harassment from his employer due to his decreased productivity, and when I get the case, the employer/insurer may try to argue that any serious injury to the employee may have happened at home instead of at work.
Recently I represented a very nice young man in a back injury case that clearly demonstrates why X-rays are insufficient to evaluate back pain.
My client is a 31 year old man whose job involved installing and reinstalling fence posts. Starting at 8 AM, my client, using a sledge hammer, loosened fence posts by breaking up their cement foundations, cleaned the post base, then reinstalle the post with fresh cement. Beside using the sledge hammer, my client had to carry heavy buckets of cement and pour them in to holes in the ground.
By 2 PM that day, my client felt a “pop” in his back when he tried to lift the sledge hammer and he felt radiating pain in both legs. He reported the injury to his supervisor, who referred him to an industrial clinic. The clinic doctor took X-rays which described “mild disc space narrowing at L4-5″ but no other impairment. More on Company Doctor Uses X-Rays Instead of MRI and Misses Herniated Disc
Filed under Georgia Workers' Compensation, Medical Care by


